Thread:SuperAngryBirdies/@comment-36107211-20200317100146/@comment-36107211-20200321103345

SuperAngryBirdies wrote: TBH I think a-lot of our rules are really vague and don't really explain what they mean well, for example: This is why old admins found these things so easy to block people, we don't define any language we use and it can create unfair bonus power for those who want it. I agree. I'll get to work to redo some of the rules.
 * Applying to be Staff: We'll decide if you're ready. - Not a single requirement or staff system in place
 * Crossovers: Make sure it isn't outlandish. - What does that mean to us?
 * Baby-ish/Cancerous - That's hard to quantify.
 * Don't plagiarise - Define what degree of plagiarism "Are they using the same/obvious idea or is it directly stolen" we never specify.
 * Do not necrobump: This isn't a strict rule - That just reads to me, do it!
 * Do not revive deleted articles - What if someone happens to come up with the same name?! We never say you can do that!
 * Nothing will be bigger than Megant: This isn't strict! - Firstly, that feels Uber limiting. Secondly, we don't define isn't strict anywhere.
 * Don't abuse power - What is abuse and what is needed?
 * No recolours unless it's a base - What is a base? There is no solid answer to that. And also some people don't have good art skills and this severely hurts their chances of learning. Heck I'M a recolour!